Adam B at dKos provides an interesting analysis of the Supreme Court decision to strike down Vermont's campaign finance law. It is an interesting decision, since it resulted in six different opinions out of the nine Justices.
Then NYU law professor Rick Pildes offers analysis regarding how these decisions suggest the court might rule on the gerrymandering cases. Since Roll Call states that the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to announce its decision on Tom DeLay's 2003 Texas redistricting this week, Prof. Pildes' ideas are quite timely.
No comments:
Post a Comment