A list of 2008 state primaries and caucuses

Here is a list of the 2008 state primaries and caucuses for both parties. The source for the Democratic races is the New York Times (Democrats.) The source for the Republican races is The New York Times (Republicans.)

Month	Date	Day	State	Party	Type	Delegates	Party	Type	Delegates
January	03	Thur	Iowa	Dem	Cauc	57	Rep	Cauc	40
-	05	Sat	Wyoming	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	28
-	08	Tues	New Hampshire	Dem	Prim	30	Rep	Prim	12
-	15	Tues	Michigan	Dem	Prim	0 *	Rep	Prim	60 **
-	19	Sat	Nevada	Dem	Cauc	33	Rep	Cauc	34
-	19	Sat	South Carolina	-	-	-	Rep	Prim	47
-	26	Sat	South Carolina	Dem	Prim	54	-	-	-
-	29	Tues	Florida	Dem	Prim	0 *	Rep	Prim	57 **
February	01	Fri	Maine	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	21
-	05	Tues	Alabama	Dem	Prim	60	Rep	Prim	48
-	05	Tues	Alaska	Dem	Cauc	18	Rep	Cauc	29
-	05	Tues	Arizona	Dem	Prim	67	Rep	Prim	53
-	05	Tues	Arkansas	Dem	Prim	47	Rep	prim	34
-	05	Tues	California	Dem	Prim	441	Rep	Prim	173
-	05	Tues	Colorado	Dem	Cauc	71	Rep	Cauc	46
-	05	Tues	Connecticut	Dem	Prim	60	Rep	Prim	30
-	05	Tues	Delaware	Dem	Prim	23	Rep	Cauc	18
-	05	Tues	Georgia	Dem	Prim	103	Rep	Prim	72
-	05	Tues	Idaho	Dem	Cauc	23	-	-	-
-	05	Tues	Illinois	Dem	Prim	185	Rep	Prim	70
-	05	Tues	Kansas	Dem	Cauc	41	-	-	-
-	05	Tues	Massachusetts	Dem	Prim	121	Rep	Prim	43
-	05	Tues	Minnesota	Dem	Cauc	88	Rep	Cauc	41
-	05	Tues	Missouri	Dem	Prim	88	Rep	Prim	58
-	05	Tues	Montana	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	25
-	05	Tues	New Jersey	Dem	Prim	127	Rep	Prim	52
-	05	Tues	New Mexico	Dem	Cauc	38	Rep	Prim	32
-	05	Tues	New York	Dem	Prim	281	Rep	Prim	101
-	05	Tues	North Dakota	Dem	Cauc	21	Rep	Cauc	26
-	05	Tues	Oklahoma	Dem	Prim	47	Rep	Prim	41
-	05	Tues	Tennessee	Dem	Prim	85	Rep	Prim	55
-	05	Tues	Utah	Dem	Prim	29	Rep	Prim	36
-	05	Tues	Democrats Abroad	Dem	Prim	11	-	-	-
-	05	Tues	West Virginia	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	30
-	09	Sat	Kansas	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	39
-	09	Sat	Louisana	Dem	Prim	68	Rep	Prim	47
-	09	Sat	Nebraska	Dem	Cauc	31	-	-	-
-	09	Sat	Washington	Dem	Cauc	97	Rep	Cauc	40
-	09	Sat	Virgin Islands	Dem	Other	09	-	-	-
-	10	Sun	Maine	Dem	Cauc	38	-	-	-
-	12	Tues	District of colombia	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	09
-	12	Tues	Maryland	Dem	Prim	99	Rep	Prim	37
-	12	Tues	Pensylvania	-	-	-	Rep	Prim	74
-	12	Tues	Virginia	Dem	Prim	103	Rep	Prim	63
-	16	Sat	Guam	-	-	-	Rep	Other	09
-	19	Tues	Hawaii	Dem	Cauc	29	-	-	-
-	19	Tues	Wisconsin	Dem	Prim	92	Rep	Prim	40
March	01	Sat	American Samoa	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	09
-	04	Tues	Ohio	Dem	Prim	161	Rep	Prim	88
-	04	Tues	Rhode Island	Dem	Prim	32	Rep	Prim	20
-	04	Tues	Texas	Dem	Prim	228	Rep	Prim	140
-	04	Tues	Vermont	Dem	Prim	23	Rep	Prim	17
-	08	Tues	Wyoming	Dem	Cauc	18	-	-	-
-	10	Mon	American Samoa	Dem	Cauc	09	-	-	-
-	11	Tues	Mississippi	Dem	Prim	40	Rep	Prim	39
April	03	Thur	District of Colombia	Dem	Cauc	38	-	-	-
-	05	Sat	Virgin Islands	-	-	-	Rep	Other	06
-	22	Tues	Pennsylvania	Dem	Prim	188	-	-	-
May	03	Sat	Guam	Dem	Other	09	-	-	-
-	06	Tues	Indiana	Dem	Prim	85	Rep	Prim	57
-	06	Tues	North Carolina	Dem	Prim	134	Rep	Prim	69
	13	Tues	West Virginia	Dem	Prim	39	-	-	-
	13	Tues	Nebraska	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	33
-	17	Sat	Hawaii	-	-	-	Rep	Cauc	20
-	20	Tues	Kentucky	Dem	Prim	59	Rep	Prim	45
-	20	Tues	Oregon	Dem	Prim	65	Rep	Prim	30
-	27	Tues	Idaho	-	-	-	Rep	Prim	32
June	03	Tues	Montana	Dem	Prim	24	-	-	-
-	03	Tues	South Dakota	Dem	Prim	23	Rep	Prim	27
-	07	Sat	Puerto Rico	Dem	Cauc	56	-	-	-

Notes:

* All Democratic delegates stripped by Democratic National Committee because Michigan and Florida moved to a date prior to February 5 without permission of the DNC.
** One-half Republican delegates stripped by Republican national Committee because Michigan and Florida moved to a date prior to Febuary 5 without permission of the RNC.

Type "Cauc" means that the type of candidate selection is Caucus
Type "Prim" means that the type of candidate selection is Primary
Type "Other" indicates that the method of candidate selection was neither a primary nor a caucus. Further data is not available here.

"Dem" is Democrat
"Rep" is Republican

See also Congressional resignations - retirements.

---

It took me six hours to put this table together in Blogger and then edit the data for errors. Since each new editing effort showed another error or needed improvement, this may well not yet be perfect. So anyone who sees a needed correction, please leave a comment with a link to verification of the data.

The other consideration is that his data was posted December 13, 2007 based on the report in the New York Times. Changes in the basic data after that time may or may not be noticed and incorporated.