Two recent news stories graphically illustrate the nature of Bush rules. It’s been well documented that the Administration was indifferent to the tragedy wrought by Hurricane Katrina, until there was an enormous public outcry. What hasn’t been talked about is the contrast between this occasion and their response to Hurricane Frances in September of 2004. Two months before the presidential election, Frances was threatening Florida, with its 27 electoral votes, and the Bush Administration leaped into action. The National Guard was mobilized and federal-state-non-profit task force was launched – before Frances hit. Bush rules dictated that the Administration had to perform well in this time of crisis, because it represented a political opportunity. Katrina didn’t command the same urgency as it didn’t occur in an election year – Bush was making speeches in California on the day the Hurricane hit the Gulf Coast.See what I mean?
Per FEC regulations, this is an online magazine for political reports, analysis & opinion. New name, same magazine. See Explanation.
Thursday, October 13, 2005
Why should anyone trust Bush?
There is in fact no reason, because he is out for himself first, and will temporarily help anyone who can provide him a benefit. He absolutely lacks any sense of social conscience or recognition of noblesse oblige. Think that is an over statement? Here is Bob Burnett writing at Huffington Post:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment