Giulianni running as 'pro-life;' also changes his birthday to 9/11

Giulianni, in addition to running his basic campaign based entirely on 9/11, appears to be attempting to appeal to the pro-life social Republicans. This strategy will require more continued use of the term 9/11 in all campaign events while making statements to reverse his well-known pro-choice position and support for Planned Parenthood. The appeal to the social Republicans has begun with statements from Giulianni allies.

Pro-life Texas Congressman Pete Sessions announced on TV preacher Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network that Rudy Giulianni is actually a pro-life politician.

Considering Rudy's long support for Planned Parenthood and the pro-choice movement, this has to be viewed as a desperate attempt by the Guilianni camp to make inroads into the strong single-issue anti-abortion Christian right. This announcement by Rep. Sessions isn't just one ally going off message. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y., also a Guilianni supporter, made a similar announcement on MSNBC last night.

This extreme reversal in Giulianni's position on the legal status of abortion can't be merely desperation as he attempts woo social conservatives to win the Republican nomination for President. More likely it is part and parcel of Rudy's repeated statement that "9/11 changed everything!"

I predict that this radical switch in Rudy's political position on abortion is just a preliminary to the surprise announcement that he will be changing the celebration of his birthday to September 11. His reversal of position on abortion will also become part of his complete and total rebirth which occurred September 11, 2001.

---

[Revised for clarity October 6, 2007.]

Rudy Giuliani offers the bipartisan foreign policy establishment a challenge

Kevin Drum points out that Rudy Giuliani is either lying about what his foreign policy as President would be, or he is bat-shit insane.

Any review of what he has presented as foreign policy will demonstrate that those are the only two choices. The question really is whether "the bipartisan foreign policy community" will treat his proposals as suggestions to be seriously considered and even compromised with, or will they publicly admit that they are insane.

My bet is that we will hear statements that compare Giuliani's foreign policy idiocies to the excretions of flying rodents are the extremists and that anyone practicing bipartisanship will compromise with his proposed policies.

Rudi Guiliani - an example of the "new" GOP.

Does the apparent acceptability of the twice divorced Rudolph Giuliani mean that the Republican Party is moving away from dependence on the social conservative voters? Digby looks at that question. He starts from what Thomas Edsall wrote in TNR as he tries to explain how different Rudi Giuliani is from the recent sex-and-morality oriented Republicans. The difference does not seem to be hurting Rudi's polls as it would have in the 1990's.

...many members of the GOP elite--whose overwhelming concern is cutting taxes, a Giuliani forte--would privately welcome the chance to downplay, if not discard, the party's rearguard war against the sexual and women's rights revolutions. Much of the Republican Party's consulting community and country club elite always viewed abortion and gay rights as distasteful but necessary tools to win elections, easily disposable once they no longer served their purpose. Now, with most of the leading GOP contenders demonstrating at best equivocal support for the sexual status quo ante, that time appears to be drawing near.

So Thomas Edsall suggests that the Republican party is changing. The morality leaders of the last twenty years or so are reactionaries who lived through the sexual revolutions of the 1960's and 70's, but they are now disappearing. The recent death of Jerry Falwell and the obvious decline are examples of this disappearance. No clear leaders have replaced those two.

Digby agrees that this change is occurring. However, he disagrees that that this is a symptom of a basic change in reactionary and Southern nature of the modern conservative Republican Party.

I agree with the fact that the GOP is ready to vote for "a hero," but I don't think it signals any kind of substantive change in the GOP. The "values" obsession was just the code of the times for the standard Southern Strategy of white male prerogatives and macho ass-kicking that the Republicans have been running on for 40 years. They are just once more re-packaging their tired old crap in patriotism instead of the Bible, (which they often cycle with "states rights" and "traditional values" among other things.)

Nothing has changed. The Republicans are actually just being more honest than they've been in recent years when they didn't have a boogeyman to beat liberals over the head with and needed to erase the hideous image of that nasty man Newt Gingrich as the face of the Republican Party. "Values" was always just the girly-man version of "Giuliani Time."

The modern Republican party is all about authoritarianism, militarism and domination over minorities, women and gays. Rudy is a perfect candidate. After all, there is no candidate in the race who has humiliated women more masterfully or condoned official violence against racial minorities with more fervor. Of course the South Carolina Republicans love him.

I think this is a really insightful point made by Digby. The Republican reaction to Rudi is a clear example of a change in the nature of the Republican Party. When the Republicans lost the national security issue as a tool to beat the Liberals over the head with they shifted focus to the issues of sexual morality and dominance over women. These were code for the new version of the Republican "Southern Strategy" in which they win by attracting the white Southern racist and anti-immigrant vote.

But now they have 9/11 as a touchstone for everything they do to win elections, and they are shifting back to the more natural Republican issues of national security. The reactionary core nature of the conservative Republican Party has not changed during the twentieth century. Only the messages they use to attract different reactionary voting groups to support them has changed.

Eleanor Clift warns Democrats about the '08 election

Rudi Giuliani is setting up his argument to the voters - elect him and he will continue aggressively fighting terrorists. Elect a Democrat and the Democrats will return to the pre-9/11 defensive posture of simply responding when attacked. Eleanor Clift of Newsweek warns that if the Democrats don't quickly take this challenge on before it takes hold then Giuliani could well win the White House in 2008.

I think that Ms. Clift has an excellent point. The Democrats need to be presenting a muscular posture against terrorism to the public. I suspect that we will be seeing all of the Democratic candidates for the Presidential nomination coming out with such policies soon.